criterion-sm dice-lg ea-starwars-lg instagram lucasfilm-lg motive-lg twitch you-tube

How is Battlefield 1 better than Battlefront 2 EA?

Prev1
JAREDUP
1550 posts Member
edited April 2018
I just returned to Battlefield 1 after a long absence because the game was not loading but I fixed the issue. Anyway how can battlefield 1 be 3x than battlefront 2 if they are both made by DICE and EA? Bf1 has no where near as many problems as bf2, even bf1's launch was better than bf2's current state now by a long shot.

Edit: this is not talking about prefered gameplay, but rather game performance and issue of bugs and imbalances
For the Greater Good

9k2nxbv51kuu.gif

Replies

  • Dash
    11553 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    Maybe you just enjoy Battlefield more than Battlefront. Nothing wrong with that My Dude.

    Edit. Just saw your edit.

    Well to that I’d respond with us all having different expectations, patience levels, limits/thresholds.

    I can wait through any game being polished/getting bug fixes. But that’s Only because I’ve seen most games at their Worst before they’re even released/launched due to Alpha/Beta Testing.

    I can only speak for Myself in that regard.
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • JAREDUP
    1550 posts Member
    Maybe you just enjoy Battlefield more than Battlefront. Nothing wrong with that My Dude.

    check edit
    For the Greater Good

    9k2nxbv51kuu.gif
  • This is guaranteed to get closed

    But dice Los Angeles is better

    And you get people more dedicated
    And SERVER BROWSER
    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
  • I would say it's likely because they may be the same company and owned by the same company, but they are different studios. They obviously care about trying to make a great game here as well, but Dice IS Battlefield. It's the whole reason anyone knows who the company is in the first place, so it's always going to go to the best team, and get the most attention.

    Remember these two games are made by different teams of people across the world from each other who likely have never met or worked together. This is kind of like asking how Marvel Films made both Civil War and Thor: The Dark World. They are both movies in the same universe, and could be argued to both be flawed to different degrees, but Ive never met anyone but who says TTDW was their favorite marvel film. It's not that the guys making TDW didn't care and want to make a great movie, they just weren't as good at it as the people who made CW.
  • BEcause this game is young, and inexperienced. It needs more time to grow into the beauty it could be.
    You guys are gonna make me rich......
    Xbox G-tag
    XJO461
    That Specialist rework was disappointing.
    nceaq2h23fqj.png



  • I don’t think BF1 was as good as people remember. It had its share of bugs and other issues.

    The real answer though: BF1 had normal Cargo mode. That is all.
  • GenxDarchi wrote: »
    BEcause this game is young, and inexperienced. It needs more time to grow into the beauty it could be.

    I enjoyed bf1942 more than this title.

    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
  • I don’t think BF1 was as good as people remember. It had its share of bugs and other issues.

    The real answer though: BF1 had normal Cargo mode. That is all.

    As good as you remember? Bf1 is running right now and lots of players. I'm one of them
    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
  • Larger team working on the game no doubt. During the launch of both Battlefront 2015 and Battlefront II you could see that a lot of devs jumped ship to go work on Battlefield 1 or the untitled Battlefield 2018 game.
    PSN: Trooper8059
    "Remember: Your focus determines your reality."
    ezgif_5_a643336582.gif
  • tankertoad wrote: »
    GenxDarchi wrote: »
    BEcause this game is young, and inexperienced. It needs more time to grow into the beauty it could be.

    I enjoyed bf1942 more than this title.

    The original and best for sure.

    Each to their own though OP. I have BF1 as well but it rarely gets any of my game time any more despite it being a darned good shooter.
    Different games when all is said and done - apples and oranges etc.
    I'm hoping for a return to WW2 myself with respect to the Battlefield franchise - WW1 just doesn't appeal to me nearly as much although I did thoroughly enjoy the departure from modern/near future settings for a while.

  • It has better modes that provide us with a sense of replayability.
    A thousand generations live in you now, but this is your fight.
    mbetxwnmm1qiioixt6xy.gif
  • Battlefield 1 Pros:

    Server browser.
    Stadistics.
    Much more maps.
    Stadistics
    Maps larger by far.
    Vehicle multiplayer slots and better by far.
    Huge number of Weappns.
    Stadistics.
    More game modes.
    Stadistics.
    CONQUEST.
    Stadistics.
    More players.
    Stadistics.
    More stable game and no bugs ( almost)
    Stadidtics.
    Lots of skins
    Stadistics.


    Battlefront 2 Pros:

    Wookies.
    Star wars world.
    Wookies.
    3 games in 1 ( GA, SA, HvV).
    Wookies.
    Millenium Falcon.
    Wookies.
    LEIA.
  • Battlefield 1 was my greatest regret in games.
    I got very hyped seeing the trailers and bought it. But I found the game very very boring.
  • Docb
    58 posts Member
    not sure the OP is saying one game is better than the other gameplay wise, that is down to personal preference.

    what the OP is trying to highlight is the difference in what i would call "back office" between the two games.

    Bfield has destructible environment, 32 v 32, cavalry running around, tanks, land transport vehicles and planes, loads of weapons, primary and secondary, as well as gadgets
    Bfront has 20v20, some vehicles, air combat, 4 weapons per class and a few gadgets

    the lag/performance in Bfront is significantly worse than Bfield, even though there is much more going on on the screen/server of Bfield.

    Bfield has a server browser, stats, team spawn. I get they are not the same game, and people don't want a new Bfield with a star wars skin, but the performance issues shouldn't be different.

    Even though they are different part of Dice dealing with each game, you would expect they would use the same infrastructure, and the lag at least could be sorted. they are both AAA games, they "should" perform the same at least.
  • IronSoldier
    3430 posts SWBF Senior Moderator
    It's been out longer so more patched up and well it has more sales/players.
  • Docb
    58 posts Member
    It's been out longer so more patched up and well it has more sales/players.

    agreed, but the basic game at launch was as above, much more going on on the Bfield server, with less lag, and basic things included from launch like server brower, stats (if you don't want to see them that fine, have a disable tab, and don't show them in the final screen.)

    it is sad a game like this, being star wars and attracting all kinds of gamers, wasn't given the same level of "back office" thought/care
  • Battlefield 1 Pros:

    Server browser.
    Stadistics.
    Much more maps.
    Stadistics
    Maps larger by far.
    Vehicle multiplayer slots and better by far.
    Huge number of Weappns.
    Stadistics.
    More game modes.
    Stadistics.
    CONQUEST.
    Stadistics.
    More players.
    Stadistics.
    More stable game and no bugs ( almost)
    Stadidtics.
    Lots of skins
    Stadistics.


    Battlefront 2 Pros:

    Wookies.
    Star wars world.
    Wookies.
    3 games in 1 ( GA, SA, HvV).
    Wookies.
    Millenium Falcon.
    Wookies.
    LEIA.

    why you put leia in this list...? do they add the slave skin ?
  • Docb wrote: »
    not sure the OP is saying one game is better than the other gameplay wise, that is down to personal preference.

    what the OP is trying to highlight is the difference in what i would call "back office" between the two games.

    Bfield has destructible environment, 32 v 32, cavalry running around, tanks, land transport vehicles and planes, loads of weapons, primary and secondary, as well as gadgets
    Bfront has 20v20, some vehicles, air combat, 4 weapons per class and a few gadgets

    the lag/performance in Bfront is significantly worse than Bfield, even though there is much more going on on the screen/server of Bfield.

    Bfield has a server browser, stats, team spawn. I get they are not the same game, and people don't want a new Bfield with a star wars skin, but the performance issues shouldn't be different.

    Even though they are different part of Dice dealing with each game, you would expect they would use the same infrastructure, and the lag at least could be sorted. they are both AAA games, they "should" perform the same at least.

    Me I want a battlefield game with star wars skin.... do you remember the first battlefront..?
  • Imagine flying an LAAT with 3 of your friend....
    a two seat AT-ST...
    dice make this game for everyone .. but they forget the fun factor that make Battlefield so good ...
    By fun I mean when your tired of being serious and you just want to do stupid thing with your friends.... there not many thing to do..... Galactic assault is very linear but roaming in large map in the star wars universe would be awsome

    I really like this game, but it could be way better if Dice had focus on what they were very good ..... If you never play BF1 , you cannot understand how great the destructible environment is.....
  • acc751
    861 posts Member
    it's not tho :/

    -opinion warning-

    battlefield 1 is a pile of excrement, simply due to the fact that it has forced 1st person camera
    Many of the arguments we have about this game would not exist if this was a single player focused game like it should have been since day 1.
  • Kenobi_Dude
    1485 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    acc751 wrote: »
    it's not tho :/

    -opinion warning-

    battlefield 1 is a pile of excrement, simply due to the fact that it has forced 1st person camera

    Huh? There is 3rd person.... guess you missed out on that one.

    Post edited by Kenobi_Dude on
  • yes it's opinion on game play .... but some mecanics are in BF1 and I really wish they would be implement on battlefront.....

    after one game of conquest the battlefield is destroyed.... there is bomb crater everywhere.... I love this feature ..
  • Imagine flying an LAAT with 3 of your friend....
    a two seat AT-ST...
    dice make this game for everyone .. but they forget the fun factor that make Battlefield so good ...
    By fun I mean when your tired of being serious and you just want to do **** thing with your friends.... there not many thing to do..... Galactic assault is very linear but roaming in large map in the star wars universe would be awsome

    I really like this game, but it could be way better if Dice had focus on what they were very good ..... If you never play BF1 , you cannot understand how great the destructible environment is.....

    Nothing like trying to shoot a plane with a canon. You are spot on.

    multi seat platforms are a must.
    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
  • JAREDUP
    1550 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    tankertoad wrote: »
    Imagine flying an LAAT with 3 of your friend....
    a two seat AT-ST...
    dice make this game for everyone .. but they forget the fun factor that make Battlefield so good ...
    By fun I mean when your tired of being serious and you just want to do **** thing with your friends.... there not many thing to do..... Galactic assault is very linear but roaming in large map in the star wars universe would be awsome

    I really like this game, but it could be way better if Dice had focus on what they were very good ..... If you never play BF1 , you cannot understand how great the destructible environment is.....

    Nothing like trying to shoot a plane with a canon. You are spot on.

    multi seat platforms are a must.

    That would make the game better for sure, the originals had it so it shouldn't of been a problem
    For the Greater Good

    9k2nxbv51kuu.gif
  • Evazan127
    8105 posts Member
    It’s debatable. Battlefield 1 is a really good game.
  • bfloo
    14767 posts Member
    Battlefield1 has wider maps, better modes, doesn't feel as scripted, has a server browser, and better weapon mechanics. The infantry play is a lot better. Even the small modes have more flanking routes and choke points are avoidable.

    The Knights of Gareth are Eternal

    Pirate of the Knights of Gareth

    h846398gb27k.png


  • More time for development , more devs working on Battlefield.

    Dice Doesn't have to go thru Disney to get stuff approved with battlefield they can add what ever they want as long as it fits WW1.

    Plus there is a new Battlefield this year so I am guessing more devs are devoted to that.
    Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/TroopperFoFo/ .
    Battlefront 2 , Battlefield and more.
  • Rook008
    838 posts Member
    Polish. All of the Battlefield games seem to be a bit more polished than SWBF2.

    I would also bet that EA had to "rush" SWBF2 a little to get it out in time for the movie releases. And getting Criterion, Dice, Motive, and Lucasfilm all on the same page, that couldn't have been the most effective way to create and polish a game like SWBF2.
    Gunfighter Ballads and Trail Songs
  • Rook008 wrote: »
    Polish. All of the Battlefield games seem to be a bit more polished than SWBF2.

    I would also bet that EA had to "rush" SWBF2 a little to get it out in time for the movie releases. And getting Criterion, Dice, Motive, and Lucasfilm all on the same page, that couldn't have been the most effective way to create and polish a game like SWBF2.

    Yes they admit it,... it's why we don't have obi-wan /greivious / droidekas

    but they also admit they want 2 different games .... so it's really bad for those who love battlefield but prefer star wars like me !
  • Rook008 wrote: »
    Polish. All of the Battlefield games seem to be a bit more polished than SWBF2.

    I would also bet that EA had to "rush" SWBF2 a little to get it out in time for the movie releases. And getting Criterion, Dice, Motive, and Lucasfilm all on the same page, that couldn't have been the most effective way to create and polish a game like SWBF2.

    Yes they admit it,... it's why we don't have obi-wan /greivious / droidekas

    but they also admit they want 2 different games .... so it's really bad for those who love battlefield but prefer star wars like me !
    Rook008 wrote: »
    Polish. All of the Battlefield games seem to be a bit more polished than SWBF2.

    I would also bet that EA had to "rush" SWBF2 a little to get it out in time for the movie releases. And getting Criterion, Dice, Motive, and Lucasfilm all on the same page, that couldn't have been the most effective way to create and polish a game like SWBF2.

    Yes they admit it,... it's why we don't have obi-wan /greivious / droidekas

    but they also admit they want 2 different games .... so it's really bad for those who love battlefield but prefer star wars like me !

    They want two different games to a fault though. Battlefield has been around a long time and they figured out a lot of things that work. Like ....server browser. Squads. Platoons. Environmentals. Vehicles.

    "We don't want to be Battlefield". It's costing them easy opportunities.
    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
  • Empire_TW
    5940 posts Member
    I haven't played Battlefield 1 but if there was one thing Both EA's battlefronts did better then BF4 was quickmatch (even though thats all they have and no server browser). Bf4 quickmatch always put me in empty servers or a game of 5v4 of conquest on a map made for 64 players.
    Janina Gavankar/Iden Versio Fan
    hojevrxvarht.png
    PSN: Empire_TW. Twitter: Empire_TW. Youtube: Empire_TW.
  • I played Battlefield 1 for quite some time and still do play testing for Incursions. It's a very fun game and yes, more robust and polished versus Battlefront. However, that game had it share of balancing issues and lag.

    Battlefront and Battlefield have different producers, and are done by different developers, although some devs float between the two. Also, Disney/Lucasfilm has the final say for Battlefront whereas Battlefield is EA/DICE's own IP and they can do whatever they want. I feel this is why Battlefront will never get chat as Lucasfilm wants to keep it as family friendly as possible.
  • Kenobi_Dude
    1485 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    Meh Battlefield 1 is fine...I guess. The world war era games aren’t anything new. A revolutionary war game would be interesting if the slow reloading muskets could hold our attention. I guess swords and horses would help.

    If I’m going to play a game set in the past, I rather it be a LONG time ago set in a galaxy far away. BF2015 and BF2 were the only FPS i played heavily since Xbox360 days of COD.
  • Dash
    11553 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    Battlefront 2 & BF4 > BF1.

    Just my opinion.
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • DarthJ
    6333 posts Member
    For me, until BF2 is fleshed out, Battlefield 1 is currently streets ahead of it as an FPS. Tons of replayability.
    PSN: ibrajoker59
  • Dash
    11553 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    DarthJ wrote: »
    For me, until BF2 is fleshed out, Battlefield 1 is currently streets ahead of it as an FPS. Tons of replayability.

    Well yeah, BF1 has been out for over a year so.. yeah. It should be Streets ahead because it is :wink:

    But I agree, Battlefront 2 needs a LOT of Polish. But I do know it will get to that level of Polish. :blush:
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • Dezert
    206 posts Member
    Both games kick **** as far as I'm concerned; I stopped playing BF1 when SWBF2 released. Off the top of my head:

    Battlefield 1 (800 hours)---
    Player Stats
    More primary weapons
    More maps
    Server Browser
    Choose your squad and spawn on your Squad
    Squad Leader Assigns Objective to Squad
    Bonus Points to top squads and winning team (Incentive to win, not just get kills)
    Team Shuffle/Balance
    Less bugs than SWBF2
    More than one player in a vehicle
    __________________________________________


    Battlefront 2 (600 hours)---

    [subjective] Game play is more dynamic/more enjoyable than BF1
    Fluid player movement
    Visually stunning
    Variation in game modes
    It's Star Wars!
    ....and this game isn't finished, thinking the best is yet to come.
    XBox/Steam/Origin >> M1chaelSavage
    1UcxMVz.gif
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    >>>>>>> Player Stats we will have <<<<<<<
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  • Dash
    11553 posts Member
    Dezert wrote: »
    Both games kick **** as far as I'm concerned; I stopped playing BF1 when SWBF2 released. Off the top of my head:

    Battlefield 1 (800 hours)---
    Player Stats
    More primary weapons
    More maps
    Server Browser
    Choose your squad and spawn on your Squad
    Squad Leader Assigns Objective to Squad
    Bonus Points to top squads and winning team (Incentive to win, not just get kills)
    Team Shuffle/Balance
    Less bugs than SWBF2
    More than one player in a vehicle
    __________________________________________


    Battlefront 2 (600 hours)---

    [subjective] Game play is more dynamic/more enjoyable than BF1
    Fluid player movement
    Visually stunning
    Variation in game modes
    It's Star Wars!
    ....and this game isn't finished, thinking the best is yet to come.

    a299n236vgx8.gif
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • I think some of it might be the type of audience each game caters to. Bf2 has to be more casual because star wars is a general audience. Whereas bf1 is more of a fps that highlight team play. Much more objective focused than other fps games like call of duty. Bf2 2as meant to be casual so I dont know if balance was a total focus. It should have been but with star cards it means more playstyles and possibilities to consider in balancing. I'm speaking out of my azs here but I own both game and season pass in bf1. I just enjoy bf2 much more even though I dont think it's a great game. Its something I can come home from work and play for a few hours to relax where bf1 I need to be totally focused.
  • stevenomes wrote: »
    I think some of it might be the type of audience each game caters to. ...
    I think SWBF2 tries to first cater to Star Wars fans, and then to FPS players. You can just mess around in a game mode as big as Galactic Assault and still have fun with the Star Wars experience. Or fly Starfighters in SA. Or just go into arcade mode and play as a light saber user.

    Gunfighter Ballads and Trail Songs
  • Heh BF4 killed Battlefield games for me. The best one IMHO was Bad Company 2 and also the Vietnam DLC.
    Battlefield 3 was the beginning of the garbage Frostbite engine, which was made even worse in BF4. Never got BF1. Some of my friends did and they have pretty much gotten tired of it as well. And it had a ton of bugs, alot more than some people here would like to believe.

    Just my .02 cents on Battlefield...
  • TheStalker88
    6084 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    Battlefield 1 Pros:

    Server browser.
    Stadistics.
    Much more maps.
    Stadistics
    Maps larger by far.
    Vehicle multiplayer slots and better by far.
    Huge number of Weappns.
    Stadistics.
    More game modes.
    Stadistics.
    CONQUEST.
    Stadistics.
    More players.
    Stadistics.
    More stable game and no bugs ( almost)
    Stadidtics.
    Lots of skins
    Stadistics.


    Battlefront 2 Pros:

    Wookies.
    Star wars world.
    Wookies.
    3 games in 1 ( GA, SA, HvV).
    Wookies.
    Millenium Falcon.
    Wookies.
    LEIA.

    You forgot to put Chewy on the list slightly above Leia and put in REY in between every 3rd point.
  • tankertoad
    5921 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    DarthJ wrote: »
    For me, until BF2 is fleshed out, Battlefield 1 is currently streets ahead of it as an FPS. Tons of replayability.

    Well yeah, BF1 has been out for over a year so.. yeah. It should be Streets ahead because it is :wink:

    But I agree, Battlefront 2 needs a LOT of Polish. But I do know it will get to that level of Polish. :blush:

    Your prescient? Because there's absolutely no way to know that and there has been nothing done to give faith in that.

    This game will never reach the heights of Battlefield one. That is still being worked on.
    Post edited by tankertoad on
    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
  • Dash
    11553 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    tankertoad wrote: »
    DarthJ wrote: »
    For me, until BF2 is fleshed out, Battlefield 1 is currently streets ahead of it as an FPS. Tons of replayability.

    Well yeah, BF1 has been out for over a year so.. yeah. It should be Streets ahead because it is :wink:

    But I agree, Battlefront 2 needs a LOT of Polish. But I do know it will get to that level of Polish. :blush:

    Your prescient? Because there's absolutely no way to know that and there has been nothing done to give faith in that.

    This game will never reach the heights of Battlefield one. That is still being worked on.

    I stated that this game will be polished. BF1 has been out for over a year. What’s up Chuck!?
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • bfloo
    14767 posts Member
    tankertoad wrote: »
    DarthJ wrote: »
    For me, until BF2 is fleshed out, Battlefield 1 is currently streets ahead of it as an FPS. Tons of replayability.

    Well yeah, BF1 has been out for over a year so.. yeah. It should be Streets ahead because it is :wink:

    But I agree, Battlefront 2 needs a LOT of Polish. But I do know it will get to that level of Polish. :blush:

    Your prescient? Because there's absolutely no way to know that and there has been nothing done to give faith in that.

    This game will never reach the heights of Battlefield one. That is still being worked on.

    I stated that’s this game will be polished. BF1 has been out for over a year. What’s up Chuck!?

    This game needs a lot of polishing. This is the first Battlefront that can't hold my interest :'(
    The Knights of Gareth are Eternal

    Pirate of the Knights of Gareth

    h846398gb27k.png


  • Dash
    11553 posts Member
    bfloo wrote: »
    tankertoad wrote: »
    DarthJ wrote: »
    For me, until BF2 is fleshed out, Battlefield 1 is currently streets ahead of it as an FPS. Tons of replayability.

    Well yeah, BF1 has been out for over a year so.. yeah. It should be Streets ahead because it is :wink:

    But I agree, Battlefront 2 needs a LOT of Polish. But I do know it will get to that level of Polish. :blush:

    Your prescient? Because there's absolutely no way to know that and there has been nothing done to give faith in that.

    This game will never reach the heights of Battlefield one. That is still being worked on.

    I stated that’s this game will be polished. BF1 has been out for over a year. What’s up Chuck!?

    This game needs a lot of polishing. This is the first Battlefront that can't hold my interest :'(

    Yeah it needs a lot sadly. :(
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • Rook008
    838 posts Member
    The thing is, it needs fixing or polishing in certain specific areas.

    Blast, Strike, and SA are pretty much where they need to be. Some maps may need a tweak here and there. Weapons are pretty good. Movement and class abilities mostly work as intended. More content would be great. SA only has 6 maps.

    GA and HvV needs the most work, I think. Heroes have all kinds of bugs and balance is an issue. Heroes, Vehicles, and Troopers in GA all need some work. Some map tweaks. But the basics are all already there, they just need to work out the bugs and balance everything out.
    HvV, from what I've seen on the forums, needs some balancing and bug fixing as well.

    Matchmaking for all game modes needs help. And more content.
    Gunfighter Ballads and Trail Songs
  • tommytom64
    1079 posts Member
    edited April 2018
    Seriously though...

    This game needs a SERVER BROWSER! Just as much as, if not more then, Conquest. Wish I saw more people speaking for this.
  • I hope the next battlefield is Vietnam. Need some hueys and m60s in my life
  • tommytom64 wrote: »
    Seriously though...

    This game needs a SERVER BROWSER! Just as much as, if not more then, Conquest. Wish I saw more people speaking for this.

    I say it like every day multiple times a day.

    Server browser is not going to happen unfortunately. Conquest of old is unlikely we might get some type of Supremacy.
    41st.org Founder "Where the Game is Winnable."

    are-you-threatening-me-gif.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!