Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
- 4.9K Gameplay Discussion
- 9.5K Feedback & Suggestions
- 627 Community Events and Creations
- 1.6K Star Wars™ Battlefront II Recruitment
- 3.1K Off-topic
Replies
Now THAT sounds like a balanced plan....accept for Anakin who doesn't need any help to steer a phase 4 however he wants. But still, I like that set up.
Xbox G-tag
That Specialist rework was disappointing.
I prefer a max of 2 in all the phases.
And just have the 4 base classes. Swear, it'd be so wonderful to have to see star cards switched up for utility AND "hurr durr i swing my litsabr in ur genearl direktino u ded" take a seat, as it should.
Iron enigma treateth, Ultima
Shielding light retreateth, Ultima
Hydaelyn defeated. Ah, Ultima
"I have never died to a Finn"
I’d be all over it. I don’t mind reinforcements though.
Nothing is worse than heroes dominating the first phase and ending the game early - I'd like at least to get to phase 2.
A 'Trooper only' event (with NO enforcers also) would be great (imagine the way it would change the game play dynamic).
Never forget
20v20....GA maps....no heroes....no tiered back ups....no silly BP's. It's just so simple (and frightening to players who can't hold their own without advantages).
Heroes are a great part of Galactic Assault and capital supramacy, they add a lot of fun and phatos to the games, but the limit must be 2 per side.. Too many of them can ruin the balance
Some of those final phases in Nerfed vs Heroes were beyond ridiculous and I’ve not actually played it since the introduction of Anakin.
It was bad before ani was added too.
Pirate of the Knights of Gareth
A limit of 2 per side would be greatly appreciated.
And then we call it Battlefield with less weapons and no balancing.
If you want a large scale infantery Game then go play Battlefield,CoD, Medal of Honor or whatever there is.
Heroes are an integral part of the Star Wars Universe and of this Game
Its what sets it apart from other Games.
And wether you like that or not is up to you BUT many players play this Game for the Heroes.
There are many great Games as an alternative(even made by dice OMG) and maybe it has crossed your mind that if you take out the heroes this game becomes obsolete next to Battlefield which is made again ALSO BY DICE
Wrong. Just plain wrong.
And I seriously doubt you or DICE are willing to refund those of us who bought it on the premise this would be an improvement to BF2015 when we purchased the "Deluxe Trooper Edition".
First off why?
And secondly... what has one to do with the other?
Aside from the point that i dont see why anyone should refund people who bought that version 2 years after release but i dont see your point
Are you telling me because there is a trooper box that trooper should be stronger?
Help cause i dont get what youre trying to say
Now if GA was a total of 64 players with larger and more open maps then maybe 4 heroes per team would be ok but in a 40 player mode with small maps, where most of those maps funnel into a room, 4 heroes per side is a little too much. Great being killed by heroes in the spawn area in the final phase of maps like Naboo, Endor and Takodana. GA, which should be an epic battle with all items available throughout the match like WA was, just turns into heroes camping spawn areas in the final phases on a lot of these GA maps. Boring.
Era locked GA was one of the better events EA has done. HU was also a lot of fun. Over a year and a half later some of us are still waiting on the GA weekend event without heroes. Unfortunately I don’t believe this game has the population nor the dev resources to support both non hero and HU GA modes.
2 heores was fin in the beta and era locked event.
the final phase is a waste unless you have one too with 4 aside.
Pirate of the Knights of Gareth
If they did implement this idea, most players would simply camp the loading screen after they've collect enough points from Phase 1.
Baby Yoda is love, Baby Yoda is life.