criterion-sm dice-lg ea-starwars-lg instagram lucasfilm-lg motive-lg twitch you-tube
Felucia Transmission

Client-side Emote Suppression.

124

Replies

  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Can we suppress forum signatures, while we're at it? Devastator21823's comic doesn't make any sense, and is annoying to see over and over again.
  • Fevee wrote: »
    Can we suppress forum signatures, while we're at it? Devastator21823's comic doesn't make any sense, and is annoying to see over and over again.

    You can do it yourself in the forum settings. I have mine set to suppress images, but keep the text.
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Hans, you really are the best!
  • Defbored
    1548 posts Member
    The enforcers definitely need emotes for the world to see.
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    As someone who pretty-much lives in HvV, now, I'm starting to not care about enforcers. They're all garbage, and the wookiee is god; except when I'm playing as a WW. No matter what gamemode I pick, it's always a one-way slaughter. So if I have to get slaughtered by 20 people, 10 people, 8 people, 4 people, or just 2 people, I'll pick the lower numbers; at least I saw it coming and don't have to watch my back as often.

    Victory should still be enough gratification for them, though, they shouldn't have to rub it in afterwards. The one emote that's ever been worth using/seeing, is someone doing Winner in those few seconds before the even battle starts. As though they're excited that the base is getting attacked.
  • Fevee wrote: »
    Can we suppress forum signatures, while we're at it? Devastator21823's comic doesn't make any sense, and is annoying to see over and over again.

    That signature is marvelous.
    SFA Reinforcement Ideas - https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/98321/starfighter-assault-reinforcement-ideas#latest

    Specialist Scout Pistol Addition - https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/90785/flash-pistol-scout-pistol-needs-to-be-on-specialist-please/p1

    "Lean upon pain like a crutch and you create anger and a dark fear of truth. Pain guides, but it does not support" Obi-Wan Kenobi

    3i4nza8m24rn.gif
  • Dash wrote: »
    Fevee wrote: »
    Lol, what? You lost your own thread?

    Yep. Help me find it and I'll continue there.


    For now, clientside emote suppression. Make it a thing.

    1. Won’t happen. It’s a waste of time to protect feelings from an in game animation/emote.
    2. Waste of time in general.
    3. There are far more important ongoing issues in the game (Bugs & Exploitable terrain) that need to be attended to and fixed.
    4. Content & Balance > All concerns of emotional responses from a players death and the enemy that killed him celebrating about it.

    #BagsOfTeaForEveryoneISlay

    True
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Cease all gameular activity and seek counseling
    [+3748 posts]
  • Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.
    moenr1cb9t4w.jpg
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Why are you vehemently against it?!?!

    I am vehintimuley against it
    w7ztdv3inbgg.png
    [+3748 posts]
  • Spiito
    1926 posts Member
    edited August 2018
    Fevee wrote: »
    Can we suppress forum signatures, while we're at it? Devastator21823's comic doesn't make any sense, and is annoying to see over and over again.

    You can do it yourself in the forum settings. I have mine set to suppress images, but keep the text.

    :hushed: Oh you missed it. Here, this for that time when you never saw a signature I was using.
    mXrCxTm.gif
    It was like that but smaller and more clear. :smile: You probably don't care, but I wanted to show you anyway.
    (Like the people who want you to see them emoting, regardless... *Cough cough*)
    Post edited by Spiito on
    Wknuto!
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!
    Spiito wrote: »
    (Like the people who want you to see them emoting, regardless... *Cough cough*)

    [+3748 posts]
  • Spiito
    1926 posts Member
    edited August 2018
    Relmets wrote: »
    Spiito wrote: »
    (Like the people who want you to see them emoting, regardless... *Cough cough*)


    To be clear, I'm not bothered by emotes. (Why are those emotes called 'Band' emotes, and not '***** Wailing'...?)
    A volume slider for voices would be great though.

    (People don't seem to appreciate playing devil's advocate.)

    *EDIT* LMAO J ! Z Z is censored. And I get why. But it's literally a canon Star Wars term. It's their made up name for Jazz.
    Post edited by Spiito on
    Wknuto!
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Spiito wrote: »
    Relmets wrote: »
    Spiito wrote: »
    (Like the people who want you to see them emoting, regardless... *Cough cough*)


    To be clear, I'm not bothered by emotes. (Why are those emotes called 'Band' emotes, and not '**** Wailing'...?)
    A volume slider for voices would be great though.

    (People don't seem to appreciate playing devil's advocate.)

    *EDIT* LMAO J ! Z Z is censored. And I get why. But it's literally a canon Star Wars term. It's their made up name for Jazz.

    Why so much of this
    [+3748 posts]
  • Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!

    I don't know. Just sounds kinda weak to me. You do realize that they would still be able to tea bag you, right? It just looks like you got taunted after defeat too many times and now you want to get rid of the feature. Part of the fun of playing with others is communication. How can I have fun playing with YOU, if I don't even know if you can see my emotes? At this point, you might as well play with the AI, because it sounds to me like you want to play with drones.

    Either deal with it or go back to single player.
    moenr1cb9t4w.jpg
  • Spiito
    1926 posts Member
    Relmets wrote: »
    Why so much of this
    ...
    Indeed.
    Wknuto!
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Spiito wrote: »
    Relmets wrote: »
    Why so much of this
    ...
    Indeed.

    xBRbyhi.gif
    [+3748 posts]
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!

    I don't know. Just sounds kinda weak to me. You do realize that they would still be able to tea bag you, right? It just looks like you got taunted after defeat too many times and now you want to get rid of the feature. Part of the fun of playing with others is communication. How can I have fun playing with YOU, if I don't even know if you can see my emotes? At this point, you might as well play with the AI, because it sounds to me like you want to play with drones.

    Either deal with it or go back to single player.

    Or maybe I would rather play with good sports who don't get their thrill from rubbing their victory in the others' face. A sore winner is even worse that a sore looser. If this were implemented, YOU WOULD NEVER EVEN KNOW. But since the minute possibility that some random victim didn't see your emote is that game-breaking for you, maybe you're the one who's weak.

    There's no challenge against AI. There's no human intuition, there's no being clever or deceitful, there's no adapting strategies. It's not a victory, at that point. I'm sorry you can't seem to wrap your head around any of this. You probably don't even know what defeat feels like, you probably win even when you try to lose. I'm sorry you're not open-minded enough to see things from another's point of view.
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    @Spiito, I thought you agreed with this. Come back to the light side, I can sense there's still good in you.
  • Spiito
    1926 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    @Spiito, I thought you agreed with this. Come back to the light side, I can sense there's still good in you.

    Sorry. No can do. I've seen the logic that was presented by those who oppose.
    A compromise is all I can stand on in this thread; adding a voice slider would mean the option to turn down specifically the vocal expressions client-side, and it'd keep the physical movements synced in game.
    Wknuto!
  • Fevee wrote: »
    Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!

    I don't know. Just sounds kinda weak to me. You do realize that they would still be able to tea bag you, right? It just looks like you got taunted after defeat too many times and now you want to get rid of the feature. Part of the fun of playing with others is communication. How can I have fun playing with YOU, if I don't even know if you can see my emotes? At this point, you might as well play with the AI, because it sounds to me like you want to play with drones.

    Either deal with it or go back to single player.

    Or maybe I would rather play with good sports who don't get their thrill from rubbing their victory in the others' face. A sore winner is even worse that a sore looser. If this were implemented, YOU WOULD NEVER EVEN KNOW. But since the minute possibility that some random victim didn't see your emote is that game-breaking for you, maybe you're the one who's weak.

    There's no challenge against AI. There's no human intuition, there's no being clever or deceitful, there's no adapting strategies. It's not a victory, at that point. I'm sorry you can't seem to wrap your head around any of this. You probably don't even know what defeat feels like, you probably win even when you try to lose. I'm sorry you're not open-minded enough to see things from another's point of view.

    You know, taking away a person's ability to communicate won't change what kind of person they are. It won't make them a good sport. You're literally asking for a safe space feature. And you're not the first person to tell me I'm not open-minded. I get the impression that if you were better at the game, you would be the one flashing emotes at people. Now, I'm not one of this "get gud" people, so I'm not going to tell you to do that. Instead, I'm going to hope that the devs improve matchmaking. That way, you can get off my team so we don't get steamrolled.
    moenr1cb9t4w.jpg
  • Ah, c'mon, don't tell me you won't miss getting the "Great kid, don't get cocky" emote by a Han noob at the bottom of the scoreboard who finally managed to get the drop on you after having been snacked by you a hundred times.
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!

    I don't know. Just sounds kinda weak to me. You do realize that they would still be able to tea bag you, right? It just looks like you got taunted after defeat too many times and now you want to get rid of the feature. Part of the fun of playing with others is communication. How can I have fun playing with YOU, if I don't even know if you can see my emotes? At this point, you might as well play with the AI, because it sounds to me like you want to play with drones.

    Either deal with it or go back to single player.

    Or maybe I would rather play with good sports who don't get their thrill from rubbing their victory in the others' face. A sore winner is even worse that a sore looser. If this were implemented, YOU WOULD NEVER EVEN KNOW. But since the minute possibility that some random victim didn't see your emote is that game-breaking for you, maybe you're the one who's weak.

    There's no challenge against AI. There's no human intuition, there's no being clever or deceitful, there's no adapting strategies. It's not a victory, at that point. I'm sorry you can't seem to wrap your head around any of this. You probably don't even know what defeat feels like, you probably win even when you try to lose. I'm sorry you're not open-minded enough to see things from another's point of view.

    And then what happens when you get bagged? Are you going to ask for client side crouch suppression? Your problem doesnt seem to be with the emotes themselves but with people rubbing it in after killing you. I can promise you these players have six ways from Sunday to make you upset with obnoxious looking taunts that aren’t emotes.
    [+3748 posts]
  • Defbored
    1548 posts Member
    Relmets wrote: »
    Fevee wrote: »
    Fevee wrote: »
    Why don't you just disable other players while you're at it.

    Would a lack of emotes seriously be that game-breaking for you? Would still having your emotes and just assuming everyone else can see them be that game-breaking for you? It's not a stat change, it's not a buff or a nerf. It's not a new class or the removal of one. Why are you vehemently against it?!?!

    I don't know. Just sounds kinda weak to me. You do realize that they would still be able to tea bag you, right? It just looks like you got taunted after defeat too many times and now you want to get rid of the feature. Part of the fun of playing with others is communication. How can I have fun playing with YOU, if I don't even know if you can see my emotes? At this point, you might as well play with the AI, because it sounds to me like you want to play with drones.

    Either deal with it or go back to single player.

    Or maybe I would rather play with good sports who don't get their thrill from rubbing their victory in the others' face. A sore winner is even worse that a sore looser. If this were implemented, YOU WOULD NEVER EVEN KNOW. But since the minute possibility that some random victim didn't see your emote is that game-breaking for you, maybe you're the one who's weak.

    There's no challenge against AI. There's no human intuition, there's no being clever or deceitful, there's no adapting strategies. It's not a victory, at that point. I'm sorry you can't seem to wrap your head around any of this. You probably don't even know what defeat feels like, you probably win even when you try to lose. I'm sorry you're not open-minded enough to see things from another's point of view.

    And then what happens when you get bagged? Are you going to ask for client side crouch suppression? Your problem doesnt seem to be with the emotes themselves but with people rubbing it in after killing you. I can promise you these players have six ways from Sunday to make you upset with obnoxious looking taunts that aren’t emotes.

    you mean like the end of this video? lol.

  • ??? This has to be the worst request for SWBF 17 I’ve seen on the forums other than the request to nerf the Cantina band.
    #StarWars-y
  • You realise this request is pointless, right? A moderator came along way early in the thread, or maybe it was the last one, and said it'd likely cause so many issues with the system that it was basically a non-starter, what with setting up a toggle that alters communication from the player to the server and to other players. Aside from the instability, it'd also leave open the question of opening a vulnerability for exploitation and hacking, too.
  • Let's try to look at this reasonably- Is this even possible, and is there any precedent for this kind of thing being done for other games? What would that look like, anyway? Instead of the taunt animation and line, would you just see the trooper weirdly standing there? Seems to me that would still intuitively indicate that you were being emoted, thus signifying your enemy was rubbing the kill in your face, thus defeating the purpose of emote suppression.

    And as others have pointed out, players are going to find ways to troll. I'm kind of with you in the sense that I wish games wouldn't promote gamesmanship, but part of competitive play is not just physical skill, but mental fortitude- in other words, not letting trollish behavior get in your head and affect your resolve.

    As I see it, getting emoted gives me some challenges- I can either make it a point to get repeated revenge on the emoter, making them constantly watch their back, I can similarly turn our rivalry into an emote-off, where we troll each other back and forth in an "it's all in good fun" way, or I stay resolute, let the emoting roll off my back and focus on winning.

    And note that when I say trollish behavior, I don't mean to imply that these players are all bullies. I got teabagged in Ewok Hunt by a Stormtrooper once. I later found the guy had uploaded the match to YouTube. I told him who I was and that he teabagged me. We had a laugh about it and that was it.

    If you want challenge against real human players- part of the challenge is your mental game.
    m0j6n9yk2eer.jpg
    Xbox Live: Honorary Ewok



  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Ciena_Ree wrote: »
    You realise this request is pointless, right? A moderator came along way early in the thread, or maybe it was the last one, and said it'd likely cause so many issues with the system that it was basically a non-starter, what with setting up a toggle that alters communication from the player to the server and to other players. Aside from the instability, it'd also leave open the question of opening a vulnerability for exploitation and hacking, too.

    Yea, I dismantled that response. Not like anyone cares, you're all too close-minded to consider features that affect you in no way whatsoever.
  • Devlin21
    8329 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Ciena_Ree wrote: »
    You realise this request is pointless, right? A moderator came along way early in the thread, or maybe it was the last one, and said it'd likely cause so many issues with the system that it was basically a non-starter, what with setting up a toggle that alters communication from the player to the server and to other players. Aside from the instability, it'd also leave open the question of opening a vulnerability for exploitation and hacking, too.

    Yea, I dismantled that response. Not like anyone cares, you're all too close-minded to consider features that affect you in no way whatsoever.

    You know, you could have a discussion without the attacks.
    ss89x0xfo1re.jpeg
    keeboxdf4h4g.gif

  • Dash
    11627 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Ciena_Ree wrote: »
    You realise this request is pointless, right? A moderator came along way early in the thread, or maybe it was the last one, and said it'd likely cause so many issues with the system that it was basically a non-starter, what with setting up a toggle that alters communication from the player to the server and to other players. Aside from the instability, it'd also leave open the question of opening a vulnerability for exploitation and hacking, too.

    Yea, I dismantled that response. Not like anyone cares, you're all too close-minded to consider features that affect you in no way whatsoever.

    You know, you could have a discussion without the attacks.
    ss89x0xfo1re.jpeg

    +1 cuz Spider-Man. :sunglasses:
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Ciena_Ree wrote: »
    You realise this request is pointless, right? A moderator came along way early in the thread, or maybe it was the last one, and said it'd likely cause so many issues with the system that it was basically a non-starter, what with setting up a toggle that alters communication from the player to the server and to other players. Aside from the instability, it'd also leave open the question of opening a vulnerability for exploitation and hacking, too.

    Yea, I dismantled that response. Not like anyone cares, you're all too close-minded to consider features that affect you in no way whatsoever.

    You know, you could have a discussion without the attacks.
    ss89x0xfo1re.jpeg

    I'd like to think so, but whether ingame or in the forums, everything I try is a one-sided slaughter against me. I guess I can get kinda vicious with my words. Instead of focusing on having an actual discussion on the matter, I mostly just get taunts and jeering, so I'm surprised that you people get surprised when I actually return fire.

    It's not our job to be concerned about if it's hard on the devs or not. (Besides, how hard can a clientside trigger be?) Let's imagine that the dev sits in a room all day, with little to do, and there's a huge wall of labeled switches. These switches instantly -and without bugs- turn on and off ingame features. Now, if there was a Clientside Emote Suppression Option switch, and all I was doing was opting for that switch to be turned on, what would your reasons be for not switching that switch?

    Unlike switching off the Wookiee Warrior Can Roll During Overload switch, this doesn't change gameplay. Doesn't nerf/buff add/remove anything, as far as the casual or devoted player can tell. Other than dev effort (which doesn't count, for the sake of this metaphor), the most-utilized counter argument is along the lines of "But I need to know you can see me flipping you off!" Which is even more petty than my reasoning in the first place.

    While the moderator was the only one who offered a point worth considering, I will bet that absolutely no one has had an emote save their life. This game is too fast paced, and a mismatching hitbox doesn't care about high-impact abilities, or rapid-fire weapons. The player already volunteered to be useless for two seconds, the odds a sniper was dead ahead and aiming at your head for a few seconds longer than any skilled sniper should have been aiming anyways; you're better off jamming your hand in a haystack, and ***** your finger on the needle.
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    @Fevee you again seem to be under the false assumption that emoting is the only way they can taunt you
    [+3748 posts]
  • Devlin21
    8329 posts Member
    You do realize you can skip the death cam.
    keeboxdf4h4g.gif

  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Relmets wrote: »
    @Fevee you again seem to be under the false assumption that emoting is the only way they can taunt you

    Riddling the body full of holes, slashing around on it's location, jumping on the opponent's dead body, yea yea. My personal favorite is putting the lightsaber away after scoring the kill.

    Anything but spamming "COWARDS!" the entire session, I'd rather not see emotes in this game ever again. And if this were implemented, it wouldn't affect you in any way whatsoever.
    You do realize you can skip the death cam.

    Then sit around on the spawn screen when I have no intention of switching heroes or even their starcard setup? That makes it feel even longer.

    You guys really don't have any argument against this, and you don't even attempt to respond to the points I state, even further enhancing my case.
  • Maybe you should get better than that player and taunt back, or maybe just leave the game entirely if your feelings are so delicate. Or report them.

    I've gotten taunted at, gotten slightly annoyed, but kept playing because it's simply an immature behavior, but doesn't in any way break the game. If anything, it motivates me to git gud so they can't taunt me at all since they'll be dead and I won't be. You know... just like EVERY SINGLE ONLINE MULTIPLAYER GAME SINCE FOREVER.
  • Darth_Vapor3
    4163 posts Member
    edited August 2018
    I can’t believe there is so much discussion about this. The whole concept is ridiculous in the extreme. It begs believability. I’ve heard this was a family friendly game and emotes are the equivalent to bullying or some such ____.(insert your preference) It’s been said that some folks may be less emotionally.... resilient, and that after kill emotes offending them is a consideration that might, just might, need considering? Someone even claimed that while not having a problem with emotes, they refrain because someone of youth may be on the other end. Noble to be sure, however...
    I. Beg. To. Differ.
    This is a WAR game, on a galactic scale no less. Have you not heard the hideous scream of a trooper when getting one shot slain point blank from the vanguard? Where’s the outrage? Family friendly? What about the scream of the female resistance specialist, who’s fighting for freedom, when she’s getting burned to death by the FO flame trooper? Oh that’s ok, but if the flame trooper does a jig with some mildly mocking words... THAT’S the offense? Oh yeah, the demonic looking Darth Maul sweeps into a room eviscerating CLONED troopers, who’s very existence is forced soldering with no freedom to choose a life of there own... no problem. But some sensibilities are offended if afterward, the demon, raises his lightsaber and speaks a few words about the power of the Sith? And if said demon is being played by a youth we are concerned that some emote might unduly affect them?
    With as much respect as possible, this whole concept is void. Galactic enslavement, genocide, death, war... EMOTES are that which is the issue? ?? ??????

    Much ado about nothing, this is. I wish they’d create a “Much ado about nothing.” emote in honor of this entire waste of time.
    Post edited by Darth_Vapor3 on
  • Kerle
    427 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Fevee wrote: »
    I never want to hear the "Cowards!" emote ever again.

    Plain and simple. Just get rid of that one emote.

    No.

    Well, then allow us to suppress the ridiculous emotes. You can still spam it all you want, and everyone else will still see it, so it's a win-win.

    Relmets wrote: »
    You really aren't in a position to be calling anyone "fragile" after a thread like this.

    Calling others names doesn't automatically validate your side of the argument. I've placed my points, I've responded to others', I even admit shortcomings. You people just ignore arguments that make the point, and lapse back into the name-calling, or tired already-refuted counter-arguments.

    If implementing this were as easy as flipping a switch, you'd still be against it, because your arguments are little more than "I have to rub it in their faces!"

    You're the most undiscerning human being on earth.

    Maybe you also want an option not to get killed? So those mean Wookie warriors can't hurt you anymore?

    Emotes are a fun way of communicating, the majority loves them and won't agree with your... arguements.
    You do somewhat remind me of a certain South Park episode.

    "Lady Gaga said shes addicted to [THC]. And its not harmless." - Jeff Sessions, US Attorney General

    "Yeah, ok, Jeff. But Lady Gaga also said: 'I think that men and women deserve to love each other equally'...
    ...So please, Jeff, if you going to live your life according to Gaga quotes, accept the entire canon." - John Oliver.
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Fevee wrote: »
    Relmets wrote: »
    @Fevee you again seem to be under the false assumption that emoting is the only way they can taunt you

    Riddling the body full of holes, slashing around on it's location, jumping on the opponent's dead body, yea yea. My personal favorite is putting the lightsaber away after scoring the kill.

    Anything but spamming "COWARDS!" the entire session, I'd rather not see emotes in this game ever again. And if this were implemented, it wouldn't affect you in any way whatsoever.

    So none of those other things would bother you? You said you hate it when a player is a bad sport after killing you. It's all the same, it's all rubbing it in, you really only get angry when it's the emotes?
    [+3748 posts]
  • Take a quick glance @Fevee
    d2bdyx9cpji5.jpeg
    Ponds main

    Officer of The Knights of Gareth
    uruzea55jgr4.png
  • Relmets
    2251 posts Member
    Take a quick glance @Fevee
    d2bdyx9cpji5.jpeg

    Finally I have beheld the chronicles with my own eyes
    maxresdefault.jpg
    [+3748 posts]
  • Take a quick glance @Fevee
    d2bdyx9cpji5.jpeg

    Is it possible to learn this power?
    You can't spell "steal" without EA


    hxed7ph501zd.png
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    They're emotes! Let me spell that again. EMOTES! I don't think you caught that yet. Emotes! Maybe you still missed it every other time it was mentioned: Emotes! I still don't think you guys understand what the thread is about: Emotes! It doesn't seem to be quite sinking in: EMOTES! Maybe you haven't had your morning coffee yet, Emotes!

    You people are crying like it's your private parts on the line.
  • It's okay Fevee. We get it. You're bad at the game. Embrace the suck.
  • Devlin21
    8329 posts Member
    Oh for godsake
    keeboxdf4h4g.gif

  • Fevee wrote: »

    You people are crying like it's your private parts on the line.
    Oh good...whew

    *zips pants up and wipes forehead*
    Knights of Gareth
    XBL- JsOnMyFett 13
  • Dash
    11627 posts Member
    edited August 2018
    Please close this post already. @XXXO77O4906 @IIPrest0nII It’s way past it’s expiration.
    Origin ID: "NWG_Dash"

    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyUQ3FFqM-TQd-3xtZmHOGQ?view_as=subscriber
    Link to all my Guides here in Tips & Tricks: https://battlefront-forums.ea.com/discussion/113241/custom-class-hero-loadouts-builds-revisited-pt-2-6-14-2018#latest

    "When you ask for trouble, you should not be surprised when it finds you". - Plo Koon
    rjy4wg9w86wa.gif





  • Dash wrote: »
    Please close this post already. @XXXO77O4906 @IIPrest0nII It’s way past it’s expiration.

    It was past the day it opened ;)
  • Fevee
    222 posts Member
    Dash wrote: »
    Please close this post already. It’s way past it’s expiration.
    This is pathetic

    So, you don't agree with it, but you haven't lifted a finger to explain why it's a bad idea. The only thing you people ever conjure were personal insults.

    If it were implemented, it wouldn't even affect you. It's like chopping down a tree on the other side of the planet. If you were never told, you'd never know. And still, why should you care? This feature will hurt absolutely no one, unless you guys are also offended by client-side controller configuration, volume sliders, language preferences, and colorblind options.
This discussion has been closed.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!