criterion-sm dice-lg ea-starwars-lg instagram lucasfilm-lg motive-lg twitch you-tube
November Community Calendar

Battle Point Event: Eras

1235

Replies

  • Soo much petty salt....lovin it. Better step it up... your OP "heerohhs" can't save you all the time.


    You're feelings are hurt because this weekend is a challenging type of event and you cant just keep cheesing your way to winning?

    LOOOOL


    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.

    Moreso than ever in fact since they come out sooner & have less competition both for kills from their own heroes and deaths at the hands of enemy ones. I imagine many killstreak records will be set this weekend in those few games that aren't Phase 1 shitstomps.

    Game plays largely the same, the map balance is just ruined. Particularly on non walker Phase 1s (spawntraps easy to create without Rey/Finn wallhacks to pull you out of them, as above), and the last phase of every map which now heavily favours defense.

    The ST maps are particularly hilarious as the First Order stands no chance against a Resistance team that isn't total cabbage. What usually happens in my experience is the exact same teams take turns winning and losing on those maps based on what faction they are. PT maps also were already badly favoured to lightside (p4 Kamino, P2 Kashyyyk, P2 and P3 Naboo) and now those maps have gotten even worse and developed problems for attackers on phases they didn't previously have them (P3 Kashyyyk, for instance).

    But hey some serial losers get to enjoy a near automatic 50% win rate for a few days so I guess that's good?
    This.
    You guys are gonna make me rich......
    Xbox G-tag
    XJO461
    That Specialist rework was disappointing.
    nceaq2h23fqj.png



  • Soo much petty salt....lovin it. Better step it up... your OP "heerohhs" can't save you all the time.


    You're feelings are hurt because this weekend is a challenging type of event and you cant just keep cheesing your way to winning?

    LOOOOL


    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.

    Moreso than ever in fact since they come out sooner & have less competition both for kills from their own heroes and deaths at the hands of enemy ones. I imagine many killstreak records will be set this weekend in those few games that aren't Phase 1 shitstomps.

    Game plays largely the same, the map balance is just ruined. Particularly on non walker Phase 1s (spawntraps easy to create without Rey/Finn wallhacks to pull you out of them, as above), and the last phase of every map which now heavily favours defense.

    The ST maps are particularly hilarious as the First Order stands no chance against a Resistance team that isn't total cabbage. What usually happens in my experience is the exact same teams take turns winning and losing on those maps based on what faction they are. PT maps also were already badly favoured to lightside (p4 Kamino, P2 Kashyyyk, P2 and P3 Naboo) and now those maps have gotten even worse and developed problems for attackers on phases they didn't previously have them (P3 Kashyyyk, for instance).

    But hey some serial losers get to enjoy a near automatic 50% win rate for a few days so I guess that's good?

    Oh, if only REY could have shown up and revealed the enemy positions in the DS2 video you posted, they MIGHT have had a chance. lol. Yeah, when you have an event that simply removes content, things are going to feel broken.
    moenr1cb9t4w.jpg
  • Another thing to add is how "immersive" it is to fight clone wars Kenobi and Scarif vacation Lando on Death Star II

    Agreed, they need to add more skins. But I appreciate the effort, this is waaay more fun.

    Wow, the ”accept it”-gang is really taking this well btw...

    a2e.gif
  • Another thing to add is how "immersive" it is to fight clone wars Kenobi and Scarif vacation Lando on Death Star II

    Agreed, they need to add more skins. But I appreciate the effort, this is waaay more fun.

    Wow, the ”accept it”-gang is really taking this well btw...

    a2e.gif

    I mean, tbh it is just an event, I don’t care that much. It’s a change of pace but whatevs.
    You guys are gonna make me rich......
    Xbox G-tag
    XJO461
    That Specialist rework was disappointing.
    nceaq2h23fqj.png



  • Horrible timing and just a flat out bad idea
  • Admiral_Xen
    2757 posts Member
    edited January 26
    GenxDarchi wrote: »
    Another thing to add is how "immersive" it is to fight clone wars Kenobi and Scarif vacation Lando on Death Star II

    Agreed, they need to add more skins. But I appreciate the effort, this is waaay more fun.

    Wow, the ”accept it”-gang is really taking this well btw...

    a2e.gif

    I mean, tbh it is just an event, I don’t care that much. It’s a change of pace but whatevs.

    Yeah, just putting in my two cents.

    I don't really care overmuch except I can't play PT or ST maps because they all suck (but most of them already sucked a little, anyway), just want to dissent to all this misplaced praise of an "event" that boils down to a an arbitrary content deletion that results in a balance change for the worse on all maps, but as stated it's only a few days.

    Making lemonade with lemons and trying to farm hero killstreak records now that the conditions are ripe for such.
    61tgj36mc1n9.png

  • LOTR2013 wrote: »
    Piscettios wrote: »
    stevenomes wrote: »
    now there are two factions, those that want heroes unleashed, and those that want era specific. possible to make both permanent modes or would it split community too much? I guess they would have to get rid of standard GA or it would be too much. the question then, those who like standard GA would you be in favor of it being replaced with era specific GA? thoughts?

    Definitely would like to see it replace the current GA, but my hope at this point is just to have it return as an event, perhaps once a month.

    I’ve ACTUALLY PLAYED the mode and find it quite refreshing to not see the same heroes and the same villains on every single map. My experience with it so far was that skilled and smart play won the match. Not who’s team selected the meta hero combo and spammed hero abilities to give themselves the edge.

    I can see why this wouldn’t appeal to players who think they should just be able to run wild and use opposing troopers as saber and blaster fodder.

    The limit to two max on the final phase was also a plus.
    I just much prefer seeing the correct heroes, and yes, as you've said it's nice to see more of a variety. I wonder how many people would be asking for cross-era heroes if the game had started with (the current number of) era-locked heroes.

    but the game isn't even lore accurated. I paid £90 for this and I can't even play the character I want to
  • angrycal04 wrote: »
    LOTR2013 wrote: »
    Piscettios wrote: »
    stevenomes wrote: »
    now there are two factions, those that want heroes unleashed, and those that want era specific. possible to make both permanent modes or would it split community too much? I guess they would have to get rid of standard GA or it would be too much. the question then, those who like standard GA would you be in favor of it being replaced with era specific GA? thoughts?

    Definitely would like to see it replace the current GA, but my hope at this point is just to have it return as an event, perhaps once a month.

    I’ve ACTUALLY PLAYED the mode and find it quite refreshing to not see the same heroes and the same villains on every single map. My experience with it so far was that skilled and smart play won the match. Not who’s team selected the meta hero combo and spammed hero abilities to give themselves the edge.

    I can see why this wouldn’t appeal to players who think they should just be able to run wild and use opposing troopers as saber and blaster fodder.

    The limit to two max on the final phase was also a plus.
    I just much prefer seeing the correct heroes, and yes, as you've said it's nice to see more of a variety. I wonder how many people would be asking for cross-era heroes if the game had started with (the current number of) era-locked heroes.

    but the game isn't even lore accurated. I paid £90 for this and I can't even play the character I want to

    Boohoo I guess. My favourite character is the Death Trooper, I can't play him when I want and I payed £45
  • bfloo
    15936 posts Member
    GenxDarchi wrote: »
    Another thing to add is how "immersive" it is to fight clone wars Kenobi and Scarif vacation Lando on Death Star II

    Agreed, they need to add more skins. But I appreciate the effort, this is waaay more fun.

    Wow, the ”accept it”-gang is really taking this well btw...

    a2e.gif

    I mean, tbh it is just an event, I don’t care that much. It’s a change of pace but whatevs.

    Yeah, just putting in my two cents.

    I don't really care overmuch except I can't play PT or ST maps because they all suck (but most of them already sucked a little, anyway), just want to dissent to all this misplaced praise of an "event" that boils down to a an arbitrary content deletion that results in a balance change for the worse on all maps, but as stated it's only a few days.

    Making lemonade with lemons and trying to farm hero killstreak records now that the conditions are ripe for such.

    I've had balance changes for the better on every map. Just had my 1st 2 competitive games ever on DS2.
    The Knights of Gareth are Eternal

    Pirate of the Knights of Gareth

    h846398gb27k.png


  • I think the event itself is fine. I enjoy how it literally forces players to use different heroes. It's nice to see more of Chewie, Phasma, etc. I think it would be a welcomed and appreciated event by many players if it returns on occasion. I personally don't care.

    I do want to point out that this really shouldn't do anything for the immersion enthusiasts. I mean, if you're going to have a clone armored Obi Wan running around on Endor, why not have a Finn next to him? To me, they are equally out of place. That's been a main argument against era-accurate modes from the start. They aren't going to lock skins that people are paying real money for. That would create a ton of outrage.

    I will say that PT era-accurate enthusiasts are probably quite happy right now, since all available characters have appropriate skins. Yay for them! Doesn't change how ridiculous it is to have a Young Han and clone armor Obi Wan fighting side by side on the Deathstar.

    I really don't mind all the clone wars content being added to the game. Any new content is welcomed content! But I also don't want to feel like one era is taking precedence over other eras. And it's really beginning to give off that vibe. I'll reserve full criticism until we find out what content we're getting (if any) after Anakin. I really hope it's Rogue One. Give me a Krennic and a Baze with 2 new maps and I'll be quite satisfied. Not holding my breath...
  • I do want to point out that this really shouldn't do anything for the immersion enthusiasts. I mean, if you're going to have a clone armored Obi Wan running around on Endor, why not have a Finn next to him? To me, they are equally out of place. That's been a main argument against era-accurate modes from the start. They aren't going to lock skins that people are paying real money for. That would create a ton of outrage.

    ”Do anything”... Idk, it’s better I guess but, yeah, the skins mess it up for sure.

    I don’t understand why they theoretically couldn’t lock skins though (they won’t obviously). I payed loads of credits (and I’m assuming there are those who have spent real cash on it aswell) on skins that I can’t use outside of their respective era. I don’t see why the hero skins should be an exception tbh. I can only use the clone skins on the PT maps for example. Or the rebel skins on the OT maps. I don’t get that reasoning.
  • For this to work you need the same number of maps for each era to make it fair, we all know that isn’t the case!
  • Soo much petty salt....lovin it. Better step it up... your OP "heerohhs" can't save you all the time.


    You're feelings are hurt because this weekend is a challenging type of event and you cant just keep cheesing your way to winning?

    LOOOOL


    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.

    Moreso than ever in fact since they come out sooner & have less competition both for kills from their own heroes and deaths at the hands of enemy ones. I imagine many killstreak records will be set this weekend in those few games that aren't Phase 1 shitstomps.

    Game plays largely the same, the map balance is just ruined. Particularly on non walker Phase 1s (spawntraps easy to create without Rey/Finn wallhacks to pull you out of them, as above), and the last phase of every map which now heavily favours defense.

    The ST maps are particularly hilarious as the First Order stands no chance against a Resistance team that isn't total cabbage. What usually happens in my experience is the exact same teams take turns winning and losing on those maps based on what faction they are. PT maps also were already badly favoured to lightside (p4 Kamino, P2 Kashyyyk, P2 and P3 Naboo) and now those maps have gotten even worse and developed problems for attackers on phases they didn't previously have them (P3 Kashyyyk, for instance).

    But hey some serial losers get to enjoy a near automatic 50% win rate for a few days so I guess that's good?

    Exactly. Had the same scenario on jakku and kamino (both phase 1) yesterday
  • ...heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units....

    This post started off well, at least.

    Gunfighter Ballads and Trail Songs

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/TroopperFoFo/ .
    Battlefront 2 , Battlefield and more.

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    So basically, what is being said is "Heroes that are designed to perform well in close quarters, are performing well in close quarters"

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.
    moenr1cb9t4w.jpg

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.

    From the hero players owned by vehicles you mean?

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.

    From the hero players owned by vehicles you mean?

    For ANYONE who doesn't like vehicles. Not that I'm asking for it. It's just that you fix something for one group, you make it worse for another.
    moenr1cb9t4w.jpg
  • yup this event is pretty much cancer especially with the current map rotation, 4 sequel trilogy maps in a row wears you down. only good map from this era is crait.

    what more, there are maps where only 2 heroes are selectable.
    which means when one hero dies, the team has to wait a minute before the dead hero is available because of the cool down.

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.

    No. Nothing but vehicles event. Every player is in a vehicle on every map doesn't matter how small. 20 AATs vs 20 ATRTs on nabboo.
    Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/TroopperFoFo/ .
    Battlefront 2 , Battlefield and more.
  • yup this event is pretty much cancer especially with the current map rotation, 4 sequel trilogy maps in a row wears you down. only good map from this era is crait.

    what more, there are maps where only 2 heroes are selectable.
    which means when one hero dies, the team has to wait a minute before the dead hero is available because of the cool down.

    You bring up an excellent point in regard to waiting for a cool down. LS instantly has an advantage on ST maps because DS will have instances where no one can select a hero even though one or zero are in play, vs LS that will always have a hero available.

    This should be addressed for future events.

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.

    No. Nothing but vehicles event. Every player is in a vehicle on every map doesn't matter how small. 20 AATs vs 20 ATRTs on nabboo.

    That’d be funny to see, but a steamroll lol. Until they get to Naboo in the palace.
    You guys are gonna make me rich......
    Xbox G-tag
    XJO461
    That Specialist rework was disappointing.
    nceaq2h23fqj.png



  • GenxDarchi wrote: »

    LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.

    No. Nothing but vehicles event. Every player is in a vehicle on every map doesn't matter how small. 20 AATs vs 20 ATRTs on nabboo.

    That’d be funny to see, but a steamroll lol. Until they get to Naboo in the palace.

    I was thinking about this I tried imagining how it would work on crait on the final phase. Resistance would be be constant bumper cars since they cant stop moving.

    Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/TroopperFoFo/ .
    Battlefront 2 , Battlefield and more.
  • bfloo
    15936 posts Member
    GenxDarchi wrote: »

    LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    Cue demands for a no vehicles event.

    No. Nothing but vehicles event. Every player is in a vehicle on every map doesn't matter how small. 20 AATs vs 20 ATRTs on nabboo.

    That’d be funny to see, but a steamroll lol. Until they get to Naboo in the palace.

    getting to the palace will be funnier because no one can get in
    The Knights of Gareth are Eternal

    Pirate of the Knights of Gareth

    h846398gb27k.png


  • Today I only played ST maps on GA, but personally I didn’t see too much of this LS always steamrolls and wins the first phase (if defending). The DS won one and lost one on each map (except Starkiller on which they won both). Personally, I find that two heroes per side in the last phase of each map made that phase less of a hero spamfest.

    Personally, I like the idea of having two weekends per month set aside for HU and Era-Accurate Heroes in GA.
    Bring back Extraction to the main menu please!

    What the ROADMAP should look like for 2019/2020:
    “Season” 4: Episode IX
    “Season” 5: Rogue One
  • yup this event is pretty much cancer especially with the current map rotation, 4 sequel trilogy maps in a row wears you down. only good map from this era is crait.

    what more, there are maps where only 2 heroes are selectable.
    which means when one hero dies, the team has to wait a minute before the dead hero is available because of the cool down.

    You bring up an excellent point in regard to waiting for a cool down. LS instantly has an advantage on ST maps because DS will have instances where no one can select a hero even though one or zero are in play, vs LS that will always have a hero available.

    This should be addressed for future events.

    i don't want a future event :)

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    bahahah, literally just did a 74 piece on Hoth (40+ of them outside with the scary vehicles). Want to see that too?

    I only regret that it seems the high (100+) streaks are elusive so far as games end too early with all the Yoda/WW spammers

    61tgj36mc1n9.png

  • Seems fine to me. Interesting hero variance. Just a few days anyway... No problem.

  • LOOOOL

    heroes are still completely dominating lower tier units.


    Shouldn't you mean. Certain Heroes are domination lower tier units on corridor maps? Because from what I played most heroes are dying really fast on more open maps because of how many people are playing vehicles especially aircraft now.

    bahahah, literally just did a 74 piece on Hoth (40+ of them outside with the scary vehicles). Want to see that too?

    I only regret that it seems the high (100+) streaks are elusive so far as games end too early with all the Yoda/WW spammers

    What system are you on?
    Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/TroopperFoFo/ .
    Battlefront 2 , Battlefield and more.
  • ZmanGames
    473 posts Member
    edited January 26
    I'm for era-specific play but this event could have had a much better execution.

    1. Why did you do this right after the release of a new hero? This is frustrating for people who want to play Dooku in GA since there isn't any way to choose the era you want to play in.

    2. This event would have been better if it was about a week after the release of Anakin, that way there would be a sufficient amount of Republic heroes and it would feel much better when playing as the republic.

    3. The battle points required for heroes is too low, I understand why you lowered it but with the amount of points needed being barely above 2000 it's too easy for players to get heroes.

    4. There needs to be some way to choose the era you'd like to play in. We need a server browser or an era-based playlist selector. At the very least everyone should be able to vote on the next map and then the percentage of people who vote for that map will be the percentage of the map being selected(i.e. The options are The Death Star II, Geonosis, and Crait. 80% of people vote Geonosis so it has an 80% chance of being the next map) But a server browser would be the most preferable option.

    When it comes to how the event is playing the balance is a lot better with 2 heroes on each side, although for larger maps like Geonosis, 3 heroes would still be good. I like the event itself and the authenticity of the event adds a lot to the gameplay experience for me and makes each era more unique by each era having its own set of heroes.

    If this is a test run and you implement era-specific play in Galactic Assault permanently, then definitely wait until the release of Anakin(there should be at least 4 heroes per faction), keep the hero limit to 2 per side for most maps, and don't implement era-specific play for the sequel trilogy or at least make sure Kylo Ren and Phasma are viable heroes before you do. Kylo Ren is currently considered the worst lightsaber villain and Phasma needs a buff in more departments than just her staff strike.

    I'm hoping that era-specific play is permanently implemented after February, Galactic Assault is much more enjoyable with it.

    I'm also assuming that if this is implemented permanently than multi-era heroes such as Luke and Obi Wan will have their appropriate skins based on the era.(i.e Obi Wan will have an Old Ben appearance on Original Trilogy maps and Luke will have an Old Luke appearance on Sequel Trilogy maps)

    EDIT: Alternatively for era-specific play for the Sequel Trilogy try asking Lucasfilm if you can add the bounty hunters(Boba Fett and Bossk) to the First Order's villain roster. As far as we know Bossk didn't die and its implied that Boba Fett survived the Sarlaac. I want era-specific play for the sequel trilogy as well but it would be preferable for the First Order to have a sufficient amount of villains. Also, add Lando to the roster for the resistance as he is alive during the events of the Sequel Trilogy.
    "One may be outnumbered, but that doesn't mean they're outmatched."
  • Ok, why is PT obi wan on yavin 4?

    Because Kenobi is also an OT character, if they implement era-specific play I believe that they give every character era-appropriate skins. So you'd see Old Ben on OT maps rather than PT Obi Wan.
    "One may be outnumbered, but that doesn't mean they're outmatched."
  • Add a default, classic GA and make another one for events like Unleashed and eras. I personally think this event sucks and I'm not playing GA anymore this weekend.
  • ZmanGames wrote: »
    I'm for era-specific play but this event could have had a much better execution.

    1. Why did you do this right after the release of a new hero? This is frustrating for people who want to play Dooku in GA since there isn't any way to choose the era you want to play in.

    2. This event would have been better if it was about a week after the release of Anakin, that way there would be a sufficient amount of Republic heroes and it would feel much better when playing as the republic.

    3. The battle points required for heroes is too low, I understand why you lowered it but with the amount of points needed being barely above 2000 it's too easy for players to get heroes.

    4. There needs to be some way to choose the era you'd like to play in. We need a server browser or an era-based playlist selector. At the very least everyone should be able to vote on the next map and then the percentage of people who vote for that map will be the percentage of the map being selected(i.e. The options are The Death Star II, Geonosis, and Crait. 80% of people vote Geonosis so it has an 80% chance of being the next map) But a server browser would be the most preferable option.

    When it comes to how the event is playing the balance is a lot better with 2 heroes on each side, although for larger maps like Geonosis, 3 heroes would still be good. I like the event itself and the authenticity of the event adds a lot to the gameplay experience for me and makes each era more unique by each era having its own set of heroes.

    If this is a test run and you implement era-specific play in Galactic Assault permanently, then definitely wait until the release of Anakin(there should be at least 4 heroes per faction), keep the hero limit to 2 per side for most maps, and don't implement era-specific play for the sequel trilogy or at least make sure Kylo Ren and Phasma are viable heroes before you do. Kylo Ren is currently considered the worst lightsaber villain and Phasma needs a buff in more departments than just her staff strike.

    I'm hoping that era-specific play is permanently implemented after February, Galactic Assault is much more enjoyable with it.

    100% yes! You hit all the nails, dead on.
  • Add a default, classic GA and make another one for events like Unleashed and eras. I personally think this event sucks and I'm not playing GA anymore this weekend.

    The only reason, it's been speculated, that they are always forcing ALL weekend GA players into these "events" is because their data shows them that the player base is not as strong for them to be allowed to keep them separate. If everyone is forced into it then it makes their data "appear" that GA numbers are boosted for that weekend...and that they can claim its more popular as an "event" than a separate mode.

    Still anxious to hear ANYTHING about this new large scale mode coming out...hopefully soon.
  • Funny how the Trooper focused players think the two Hero limit is SAVING GA....and the Hero focused players think it is RUINING GA. Sounds like this game needs two large scale modes for two different crowds. Then we'd be so jolly about it there wouldn't be a need to come in and attack others preferences...I'd love to have my Hero limit gameplay while you others can have your non stop Hero picking slaughterfest. To each their own....but the devs don't want that....they want us all to live in the same small house together and force us to listen to each others wildly different taste in music.

    I do think it's too bad some hero obsessed players can't take a different challenge for 3 days. Ironically I want a limit of 2 heroes at any given time HOWEVER I really love Heroes Unleashed. Its absurd and chaotic and fun and I soak it up when it's around. Its challenging in it's own right. But I dont come in here and call it a "trash", a "failure" because it's not my perfect vision of the mode. I also haven't spent my time on those HU weekends humiliating people who love it on the forums...acting like their fun is ruining my weekend, bragging about my stats or whining that I can't have every single hero all the time.

    Not hard to respect a three...day...event. Then go back to what you were doing over and over and over each match. (i.e. rack up points, pick that OP hero again and act like your so powerful and skilled taking out weaker characters all around you) The devs stated they aren't permanently changing the Vanilla Ga, so there's no need to be defensive like your children are being taken away. Is this your last weekend ALIVE or something? And if so, why do you want to spend it just playing the same ole GA Hero spamfest?
  • Jaku
    205 posts Member
    Resident Evil 2 is a pretty good game
  • The worst part of these kind of events is that we cannot play the 'regular' game. See you next month with real new content, i hope the new mode will be awazing!
  • yup this event is pretty much cancer especially with the current map rotation, 4 sequel trilogy maps in a row wears you down. only good map from this era is crait.

    Pretty much all subjective statements. The cancer has been removed. 😁😁

    No thanks we like having options instead of removing content for a boring “event” to please a small demographic of whiners who wanted this “event”
  • Should’ve been double xp event to level up dooku but instead we get this.......
Sign In or Register to comment.