Capital Supremacy and Heroes - What would you prefer?
March 27, 2019 6:11PM
edited March 27
We're looking to gather some feedback on the communities preference when it comes to Heroes within Capital Supremacy.
Let us know by filling in the poll and feel free to share your thoughts on this subject by commenting!
Let us know by filling in the poll and feel free to share your thoughts on this subject by commenting!
EA Community Engagement Specialist, NFS Heat, Battlefield & Battlefront
Twitter - Board Guidelines
// Some of my posts may not represent the opinions of EA or DICE.
Capital Supremacy and Heroes - What would you prefer? 461 votes
No Heroes
24%
113 votes
2 Heroes
43%
199 votes
4 Heroes
32%
149 votes
15
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
- 4.6K Gameplay Discussion
- 8.9K Feedback & Suggestions
- 603 Community Events and Creations
- 1.5K Star Wars™ Battlefront II Recruitment
- 3K Off-topic
Replies
Also why did you guys reinstate Wookiee Warriors on Geonosis for this mode? IF I'm killing clones on their ship, why would a Wookiee all of a sudden be there jumping into the fray?
Kinda like 2 stayed on the ground to keep it secure whilst the other 2 attack/defend the ship.
Plus the surface part is bigger i assume.
Polls are not definitive, but it lets us gain some insight into what the community is feeling on a specific subject and how we can approach things. Just because one option might be in the lead, doesn't necessarily mean that is our stance either.
These forums have and always will be my home, you guys are relevant to me - but let's stay on topic
EA Community Engagement Specialist, NFS Heat, Battlefield & Battlefront
Twitter - Board Guidelines
// Some of my posts may not represent the opinions of EA or DICE.
Agreed 100%
\⧹If you happen to have ANY ideas for any hero you desire to have in Battlefront 2, Let me know in a DM!⧸/
How to make Every Hero Viable in Battlefront 2
And thanks for listening.
This is a little off subject, so excuse me.
This is my first post in forum like this. It wasn't until this last battlefront update that I had to seek out public information about the issues that are going on with the game.
I have played this and the last version of battlefront for years now, and due to two knee surgeries i play them a lot.
When BF2 came out i was so excited and at first was so impressed with all the new features that were included. Soon I started to get bored of the lack of maps to play and types of modes there were. BF1 has so much more content and you can play for hours without boredom setting in. When I saw Bespin being added to BF2 I was stoked, I thought for sure the developers were going to start transferring more maps and modes from BF1. And that never happened.
This new CS mode is fun, if you can get a match to run. But where's the content, maps, heroes, starfighter maps, modes, more guns? I'm let down as a long term dedicated player and as a fan to the Star Wars brand. Can't the developers transfer the maps and modes from BF1 and older PS2 Battlefront? Instead we get Ewok hunt, one map CS and Dooku in PJs.
Please, fix BF2... You did such a good job making star fighter assault a better game, made the soliders roll and move better, the graphics are great, but content, heroes, guns, maps, modes. There are so many awesome ideas from the previous Battlefront games that BF2 should have been jammed with content from its launch.
And why is there no VR anything for BF2?
There should have totally been a VR option.
I spent good money just to have VR and you better believe when the VR mode came out for BF1 I thought for sure there would be a fully playable mode in BF2. What a tease and I'm sure I'm not alone on feeling this way.
I think that's all I have to say and I hope my feedback was helpful and taken well.
Thank you.
They have turned all this game in heroes vs villains a long time ago...
Or really give players the choice with a non-hero capital supremacy and normal 4 heroes version as well
no one asked for 8 heroes, 4 heroes each side was MORE THAN ENOUGH
Thanks to Anakin, surely.
No
No thanks
Finally something you say I can agree with lol. Conquest is about total chaos on the battlefield. The more vehicles and heroes, the better. It's not meant to be a safe linear situation like GA or Blast. It's not a KDR mode. It's about doing whatever it takes to control the most ground.
Ive seen a few people on the twitter poll who thought this meant 2 at total and 4 at total, I don't blame them, this was worded quite confusingly
Perhaps a new poll is necessary ?
You would be voting for 'per side'.
EA Community Engagement Specialist, NFS Heat, Battlefield & Battlefront
Twitter - Board Guidelines
// Some of my posts may not represent the opinions of EA or DICE.